editorial
‘The garden at this skunk party’
Published Thursday, 11-Sep-2008 in issue 1081
City Attorney Michael Aguirre may be the most misunderstood and underappreciated elected official in San Diego.
Aguirre endures weekly lashings in The San Diego Union-Tribune, and he’s upset the establishment and lost the support of once-loyal allies (including labor unions and some longtime Democrats).
Every now and then, it takes an objective source to put something, or in this case someone, into perspective; cue the Wall Street Journal, the country’s most prestigious financial newspaper.
In a Sept. 6 editorial titled “A San Diego Retirement” the WSJ praised Aguirre, calling our City Attorney “the garden at this skunk party,” and lauded his efforts to overturn illegal pension benefits to unionized public workers.
“Taxpayers … need a rabble-rouser like Mr. Aguirre willing to stand up to union interests,” the editorial stated. “The San Diego attorney faces a tough re-election battle in November, but he’s setting off an alarm that voters across America need to hear.”
Aguirre’s lawsuit, which was tossed out of trial court and is now under appeal, could reverse $900 million in illegal pension benefits which were approved in 1996 and in 2002, and make a significant dent in the $1.2 billion pension deficit taxpayers will shoulder for years to come.
Crumbling under the deficit is the city’s infrastructure, public safety and public services (libraries, municipal pools, etc.)
Despite Aguirre’s efforts, he’s become one of the least popular elected officials in America’s Finest City; less popular even than the “derelict politicians” (as the WSJ referred to them) – including our own Council member Toni Atkins and Council President Scott Peters – who continued to underfund the pension, shaming and nearly bankrupting the city, and who caused the city to lose its bond rating.
Aguirre isn’t one to stay quiet; in no uncertain language, he’s publicly pointed out the fraud and corruption carried out by our elected officials. And, to be fair, at times, he’s overstepped his boundaries (most notably when he called for an evacuation of the city during last year’s wildfires).
Aguirre’s forthright manner and no-nonsense attitude has cost him; to no one’s surprise, Atkins endorsed Peters for City Attorney in the June Primary (Peters failed to qualify for the runoff) and Peters has endorsed Aguirre’s Republican opponent, Jan Goldsmith, in the general election – spiteful politicking at its best. Atkins has had the good sense to not endorse in the general election.
In the Primary, the San Diego Democratic Club, a GLBT political organization, endorsed Peters, too; despite Peters’ failure to support our community when he voted to extend the Boy Scouts of America’s lease in Balboa Park, knowing full well of the organization’s discriminatory practices.
Voting to endorse Peters, the club sided instead with labor, which was out in full force at the meeting. Fortunately, San Diego voters saw Peters for what he is: a flip-flopping, stand-for-nothing-fall-for-anything politician. They sent him packing in the primary with only 16 percent of the vote.
As for the San Diego Democratic Club, one can only wonder what its members were thinking. Aguirre has fought for our community for more than 30 years, longer than many of the members have had the legal right to vote. It proved, in endorsing Peters, that the club’s members are a group of has-beens trying desperately to hold onto some vestige of power, even when it means selling out the community.
Labor has certainly been a friend to our community, particularly regarding Proposition 8, the ballot initiative to ban same-sex marriage. Labor has stepped in to help us defeat the measure; that doesn’t change the fact the pension benefits granted to public employees were illegal and Aguirre is justified in his legal pursuit.
Aguirre’s No. 1 priority, his primary responsibility is to taxpayers – illustrated again by his concern regarding a new stadium for the San Diego Chargers. In a debate this week, Aguirre pointed out the city doesn’t have the money to fund infrastructure, recreation centers, or fire safety/prevention – let alone subsidize a football stadium.
Aguirre’s opponent, Goldsmith, however, said he is open to talking with the team.
Here’s a thought: if a new stadium is, in fact, a lucrative venture and a wise investment, let Dean Spanos pay to have it built. Then, he can enjoy the profits, pay the city its taxes on his profits, and create new jobs for the unemployed – then we’ll all be happy.
Mike Aguirre isn’t employed by the Chargers; he isn’t tasked with preserving the reputations of the mayor or the City Council members; and he isn’t working for the labor unions. He’s working for taxpayers; he’s working for justice; he’s working for equality.
Kudos to the Wall Street Journal for recognizing the value in Aguirre’s work and lauding his commitment to San Diego’s taxpayers.
We hope San Diego’s residents don’t suffer from short-term memory loss (or drink the Union-Tribune’s Kool-Aid). Aguirre may be somewhat of a loose cannon, but the City of San Diego is better for his service. Come Nov. 4, we hope voters recognize that.
E-mail

Send the story “‘The garden at this skunk party’”

Recipient's e-mail: 
Your e-mail: 
Additional note: 
(optional) 
E-mail Story     Print Print Story     Share Bookmark & Share Story
Dr. Philip Princetta says:

I implore every voter in San Diego to educate themself regardless of the candidate or issues. The September 6th Wall Street Journal article was about the pension scandal and how Mike Aguirre has been a beacon of light in an issue that is a black hole of darkness for what was once
called "America's Finest City"

Of course Mike pisses people off. Everyone knows a good lawyer does just that. What matters is his intention and Mike's intention is and always has been to do what is best for the CITIZENS of San Diego.

Respectfully,
Dr. Philip Princetta

Sep 11, 2008 4:42 PM
charles pratt says:

While I agree with much of what you have written about Mike Aguirre,and I'm glad you have expressed such solid support, I must protest your unfounded and gratuitous trashing of the San Diego Democratic Club. The lamentable endorsement of Scott Peters reflected an endorsement process that was gamed and should be overhauled by the Club in my view, but the meetings are as passionate and intelligent as could be imagined for any political club, and the Club still provides an enormous amount of leadership and support to issues crucial to our community like the fight against Prop 8. Progressive entities need to stick together if we are going to succeed in the long run. I hope the GLT's future comments about our club will be made more judiciously.

Sep 12, 2008 7:55 AM
Jimmie Sober says:

I have known Mike for more than 20 years and I appreciated what the writer has written as the "Truth, the Whole Truth, and Nothing but the Truth".

With your permission, I will copy the article and distribute it without any change.

Sep 12, 2008 11:32 AM
Andrew says:

Mike Aguirre and Donna Frye have been the only strong voices against business as usual and the waste of taxpayer money by San Diego politicians.

Mike says the city attorney represents the people of San Diego, not the politicians. That's the way it should be.

The Union Tribune blasts Mike for "losing" his pension-related cases.

He hasn't lost them. They are being appealed. Local judges apparently don't like Mike. We shall see whether state appellate court judges feel the same way.

It took us a long time to get into our current mess. And it will take a long time to get out.

Past city attorneys failed to serve the people of San Diego, so we got scandal and waste while money for our neighborhoods and infrastructure disappeared.

Vote for Mike in November, unless you want to go back to the bad old days.

Sep 12, 2008 5:31 PM
Ron says:

Thank you Mike,

I can only hope that San Diego citizens
realize that Mike Aguirre is fighting the good fight, and they vote accordingly.

Remember the following:

* The City of San Diego almost went bankrupt and has been under investigation by the SEC.

* The City's financial rating is still questionable.

* Several City of San Diego employees have been indicted for Pension fraud.

* Other City of San Diego employees are currently under investigation in regard to omitting information regarding City bonds.

* Large portions of our taxes are now be directed to shore up the City pension fund while library hours are shortened, pools are closed and streets remain in disrepair.

Now City officials are starting to talk about building a new City Hall and Central Library when there are no funds available.

If Mike Aguirre and Donna Frye hadn't challenged the status quo, I believe garbage would now be piling up in front of my house, because the City could not afford to operate refuse collection.

Thank goodness the City District Attorney is an independent office, and we have Mike Aguirre.

Sep 14, 2008 3:02 PM

This story is now closed for comments. Commenting is available only on stories in the current week's issue.
Classifieds Place a Classified Ad Business Directory Real Estate
Contact Advertise About GLT