photo
Protesters gather on the west steps of the state Capitol in Sacramento, Calif., Saturday, Nov. 22, 2008, to protest the passage of Proposition 8 in the recent election.   CREDIT: The Associated Press: Robert Durell
national
Is gay the new black?
Marriage ban spurs debate
Published Thursday, 04-Dec-2008 in issue 1093
NEW YORK (AP) – Gay is the new black, say the protest signs and magazine covers, casting the same-sex marriage battle as the last frontier of equal rights for all.
Same-sex marriage is not a civil right, opponents counter, insisting that minority status comes from who you are rather than what you do.
The gay rights movement entered a new era when Barack Obama was elected the first black president the same day that voters in California and Florida passed referendums to prevent gays and lesbians from marrying, while Arizonans turned down civil unions and Arkansans said no to adoptions by same-sex couples.
Racism was defanged by Obama’s triumph, leaving gays as perhaps the last group of Americans claiming that their basic rights are being systematically denied.
“Black people are equal now, and gay people aren’t,” said Emil Wilbekin, a black gay man and the editor of Giant magazine. “I always have this discussion with my friends: What’s worse, being a black man or a black gay man?”
“Civil rights have come much further than gay rights,” he said. “A lot of people in the gay community have been condemned for their lifestyle and promiscuity and drugs and sex, so it’s odd that when they want to conform and model themselves after straight people and have the same rights for marriage and domestic partnership and adoption, they’re being blocked.”
In a cover story for The Advocate magazine titled “Gay is the New Black,” Michael Joseph Gross wrote, “These past few years we’ve made so much progress that we’d begun to think everybody saw us as we see ourselves. Suddenly we were faced with the reality that a majority of voters don’t like us, don’t think we’re normal, don’t believe our lives and loves count as much or are worth as much as theirs.”
Yet even some gay leaders are reluctant to directly tie their fight to the African-American legacy. They acknowledge significant differences in the experiences of gays and blacks, ranging from slavery to the relative affluence of white gay men to the choice made by some gays to conceal their sexual orientation, which is not an option for those with darker skin.
“I believe we are very much in a modern-day civil rights struggle,” said Joe Solmonese, president of the Human Rights Campaign, the nation’s largest gay rights organization.
“We liken some of the experiences that we have had and will have to the (black) civil rights struggle. We also are enormously respectful of the differences,” he said. “What we are best served doing is when we take lessons from the civil rights experience and apply them to our work.”
Complicating the issue is the domination of minority politics by blacks and Latinos, who can be less than friendly to gay issues.
In the vote on Proposition 8 in California, which repealed same-sex marriage, about 70 percent of blacks favored the ban, according to an exit poll; Latinos’ close vote may have favored it, though the poll’s small sample left some uncertainty. In Florida, 71 percent of blacks and 64 percent of Latinos favored a similar ban.
Opposition to gay rights often has a religious basis, and blacks and Latinos are more churchgoing than society at large. Twenty-six percent of blacks attend religious services more than once per week, compared with 16 percent of Latinos and 14 percent of whites, according to a 2007 survey by the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life.
“I do not consider (gays) to be a minority in legal and adjudicated terms, the same way people who only like to eat broccoli with butter aren’t a minority,” said the Rev. Samuel Rodriguez, president of the National Hispanic Christian Leadership Conference. “We can’t categorize things according to behavior. It’s based on ethnicity, on who we are rather than what we do.”
“Who am I to say that you weren’t born that way ... (but) sexual activity, what you do, who you sleep with, is your business,” Rodriguez said. “That’s between you, your lover, and the good God Almighty in heaven. I don’t want to know. Let’s leave sexual activity in the bedroom. The government shouldn’t be legislating what we do behind closed doors between two consenting adults. And to compare it to the African-American struggle, to me that’s an abomination.”
So is gay the new black, or did the election define a new and unique set of gay challenges?
“The gay fight for marriage has its own integrity, its own background,” said Andrew Cherlin, a professor of sociology and public policy at Johns Hopkins University. “The experience of blacks in the United States is very different. ... I don’t think it helps the fight for equality to make that claim.”
Cherlin says that fight began in the 1980s when the AIDS epidemic unfolded. Same-sex partners had few rights to help their ailing loved ones, visit them in hospitals or inherit their property, which led to the push for civil unions.
Today, only Connecticut and Massachusetts permit same-sex marriage, and a few states allow civil unions or domestic partnerships that grant some rights of marriage. Galvanized by the stinging Nov. 4 defeat in liberal California, the marriage movement is now as much symbolic as practical.
“There was a shift in the ’90s, from rights to the symbolism of being married,” Cherlin said. “This is not primarily a battle about rights now. If it was, all you’d be hearing about is domestic partnerships. Now it’s at two levels simultaneously. One is the level of rights; the second is the level of symbols.”
One symbol that some see missing from the gay rights movement is a figurehead. There are famous people who are out and proud, such as Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass., or Ellen DeGeneres. But “we don’t have our Martin Luther King or Malcolm X or Barack Obama,” Wilbekin said.
Yet the nature of activism has changed since the days when King proposed the idea of a mass march on Washington. The recent nationwide gay protests were instigated by a Seattle blogger who set up a Web page three days after the California vote.
And in some ways, gays see Obama himself as a symbol of gay progress – even though he opposes same-sex marriage.
Obama is in favor of civil unions, and during his victory speech, when he included gays in his description of America, it made them feel part of the historic racial milestone.
Solmonese said that the election defeats of Nov. 4 have inspired a level of gay activism not seen since the early days of the AIDS epidemic.
“That is buoyed by equal parts anger and rage about Proposition 8,” he said, “but also hope and inspiration about doing something that for a long time we didn’t think possible – like electing Barack Obama as our president.”
E-mail

Send the story “Is gay the new black?”

Recipient's e-mail: 
Your e-mail: 
Additional note: 
(optional) 
E-mail Story     Print Print Story     Share Bookmark & Share Story
andrew says:



There are two competing conceptions of rights that are at work in this country today: 1) the traditional concept of INDIVIDUAL rights vs. the will of the majority or the power of of the government; and 2) "identity politics" in which GROUPS are the locus of rights and entitlements, and competing groups battle it out for advantages and government largesse.

Identity politics have the upper hand now, but there are serious problems with such politics.

For one thing, individuals can be members of more than one identity group -- e.g, black, female and lesbian, or white, male and gay -- and the advantages of having one identity can be destroyed by the disadvantages of having another identity.

Second, identity politics developed out of a decision to not simply end racial and other kinds of discrimination, but to CONTINUE them in the form of preferences for certain groups or "identities" at the expense of other groups or "identities" -- specifically, racial preferences for non-whites, and gender preferences for females.

This combination of discrimination, mandated inequality, and favoritism has been a disaster for individual rights and has shredded the constitutional principle of equal protection under the law.

And it was only through a profound disrespect for logic, facts, evidence and clear thinking that identity politics became intellectually respectable in the first place.

A Baptist minister wrote an op-ed piece in today's (Thursday's) Union Tribune and tried to make the case that discrimination against gays was okay, but discrimination against blacks was not okay.

His argument relied on a factual claim that gays know to be false: that we "choose" to be gay, and that homosexuality is a behavior, not something that we can't help BEING.

Now, I am certain that this preacher knows better, because it would only take a minute or two to google up the research results and find that the overwhelming majority of those who are scientifically qualified to judge whether homosexuality is a choice or an involuntary state of being hold that it is a state of being.

But what do the facts matter?

In an age of identity politics, facts don't matter.

All that matters is that your preferred group wins, and that the group that you disfavor loses.

So the preacher consults his Bible, finds the condemnation of homosexuality that he wants, and uses it while selectively disregarding other things that the Bible condemns like wearing a red dress, eating shell fish, and so on.

Oh, and never mind the fact that the Bible was once used to justify discriminating against blacks and forbidding interracial marriage.

To be fair, I also see this kind of "thinking" in the gay community.

When I told the other side of the story that wasn't being told about the Lawrence King killing, someone posted -- at the last minute, so that I couldn't reply -- an angry, accusatory post that did not respond to my points, put words in my mouth, and called me names.

That post was the equivalent of someone who, hearing truths he doesn't want to hear, sticks his fingers in his ears and yells "La la la la la la la la" while you are talking.

Indeed, truth is the very first casualty of identity politics. It is swept under the rug and replaced by "political correctness."

Identity politics might lead to momentary advantages, but they are death to the very concept of individual rights, equality under the law, and the possibility of a vital and long-lasting Democracy in this country.


Dec 04, 2008 4:49 PM
Lauri says:

It is amazing to me that the majority of hispanics and african americans do not see gay rights as civil rights. Maybe they believe they suffered more or that somehow their history and struggle is diminished because being gay is in their view, a choice, like eating broccoli with butter. Really? When all the evidence is that most of us are hard wired to be who we are? I do think it is a mistake to call gay the new black. This is indeed a matter of civil rights- gay civil rights though, not black or hispanic or disabled or women's civil rights. So lose the label and focus on the fight.

Dec 04, 2008 5:15 PM
Chuck says:

I think that blacks are fearful that once given marriage, that gay relationships might be more stable and with the upbringing of children, that the gay family will be a stonger unit than the black family, which often has an absent father.

Dec 07, 2008 2:47 PM
Pete says:

It is ironic that the same day the Black movement toward equality got its crowning piece (a Blcak president) 70% voted to take away civil rights from another minority group. We have to educate people in all walks of life to support civil rights.

Dec 10, 2008 10:27 AM
Daniel says:

Gay is not the new Black. I find it insulting that a group of people would attempt to trivialize the hardships of the civil rights movement. But since they claim to be the new black then they must understand Christian voice in the back of our minds that keeps us from redifining the Christian defination of marriage. It is so bad that a vote for Gay marriage also ok's the use of same sex literature in schools. It also changes the way lesson are taught in Church including the way the Bible is interpreted.

Dec 11, 2008 1:43 PM

This story is now closed for comments. Commenting is available only on stories in the current week's issue.
Classifieds Place a Classified Ad Business Directory Real Estate
Contact Advertise About GLT