editorial
Year in review: 2008 plays out
Published Thursday, 25-Dec-2008 in issue 1096
It’s hard to imagine there is news beyond the tanking economy, the historic presidential election and Paris Hilton (never mind that all three converged for a very surreal YouTube moment this year).
San Diego had its own election drama in the months before Nov. 4: comedy, tragedy and history played out.
Republican Carl DeMaio made history by becoming the first openly-gay man to be elected to the San Diego City Council, while two prominent Democrats slugged it out in District 3. For all the drama and mudslinging that accompanied the District 3 race, there was some comedy, too. Candidate John Hartley was arrested for peeing in a cup in his truck, though some residents alleged the former councilman was masturbating in between canvassing neighborhoods. Ultimately, Gloria triumphed and became the second openly gay man and the first Filipino man elected to the council.
While history was made in local and national politics, the notions of history and tradition were balked at in our annual Pride parade. San Diego LGBT Pride moved Dykes on Bikes from their traditional lead of the Pride Parade to fourth in the line-up, a decision that resulted in a roaring protest from many lesbians and their supporters in the community.
There certainly is no hell on wheels like Dykes on Bikes, and the Gay & Lesbian Times’ and our editorial column became a battleground of opposing views.
We also saw courtroom drama play out as four firefighters finally had their day in court. Their lawsuit claiming they faced sexual harassment during the 2007 Pride Parade dominated headlines until the case hit a brick wall; a judge declared a mistrial in the case, and a retrial is pending.
The case was former City Attorney Michael Aguirre’s last major fight. Aguirre was voted out of office and Republican Jan Goldsmith moved in.
The biggest news of the year: The California Supreme Court’s May decision to allow same-sex couples to marry – based on the 1968 Loving v. Virginia Supreme Court decision allowing inter-racial marriage – began the Civil Rights movement of the new millennium.
California’s decision prompted Proposition 8, which had massive local financial support from “Papa” Doug Manchester, owner of the Manchester Grand Hyatt and other properties, and A-1 Storage’s Terry Caster, to name a few.
In contrast to the half-hearted fight led by the No on 8 campaign, led in large part by out-of-state Mormon money and seven out of 10 black voters, Yes on 8 mobilized 52 percent of voters to pass Proposition 8, thus defining marriage in California as a union between a man and a woman, and writing hate into the state Constitution.
Billed as Stonewall 2.0, the ensuing marches throughout the state and across the nation erupted immediately.
With hope given and taken away, the GLBT community united as never before, along with our straight allies; as many as 25,000 San Diegans marched through the streets of Hillcrest and into Downtown as a river of peaceful protests flooded the grounds of the County Administration Building, where thousands of same-sex couples had been granted their marriage licenses and allowed to marry for a short period of time in 2008.
Still, using children, faith, and fear, the folks at the Yes on 8 campaign had more of an impact – for better or worse – on your life this year than any individual, and last week, we named them our 2008 People of the Year.
As this issue pays homage and bids farewell to 2008, we look to 2009 with new hope; though we don’t expect to see an end to our economic crisis soon, we have great expectations for our new president, and for our battle for full equality.
This week, California Attorney General Jerry Brown is asking the California Supreme Court to overturn Proposition 8 – which would be another monumental win for our community.
We hope to continue to be the place you turn to for the facts – in 2009 we may just be able to report that Proposition 8 was overturned and fairness won!
E-mail

Send the story “Year in review: 2008 plays out”

Recipient's e-mail: 
Your e-mail: 
Additional note: 
(optional) 
E-mail Story     Print Print Story     Share Bookmark & Share Story
Alan J. McCornick says:

While I agree with you that Prop. 8 wrote hate into the California State Constitution, I have a bone to pick with you over your comment that black voters voted 70% against gay rights. While you are right to lay blame on Mormons, who contributed most of the money that bought deceptive ads, why are you singling out “black voters”?

For one thing, blacks who voted yes were probably no more than 4% of the total.

But that’s not the real problem. The real problem is you’ve got something badly wrong. The adjective “black” in front of “voters” suggests there is something about these particular voters being black that made them vote a certain way. There is little doubt the black voters who did vote for Prop. 8 voted not because they were black but because they were adherents of a religious ideology that says there is something wrong with gay people. (And the corollary, of course, is true also - black who were not adherents of this ideology, but were among those with no church affiliation, are likely to have voted with the 90% who voted no.)

It was the “Baptist” or the “Pentecostalist” or some other homophobic religious ideology in these people, and not their race, that prompted them to vote yes on 8. And they deserve no more blame (or credit, if that is the way you look at it) for this than any white or Asian person who voted yes. Stop blaming the race and put the blame where it belongs. To blame the race is not only racist by definition; it is also bad science. Bad construction of categories. Bad cause and effect reasoning. Later we can talk about how it wasn’t even the “Baptist” or whatever in them, but the particular (dominant but still not universal) school of thought within this religious domination, and go for the real culprit – closed-minded religion. But for now, since nobody is having at the Baptists but they are having at the blacks, let’s deal with that conceptual error first. Stop with this “70% of blacks” business.




Dec 24, 2008 2:52 PM
andrew says:

To the poster above: You're missing a key difference between white voters who voted in favor of Prop. 8 for religious reasons and black voters who did the same thing.

Historically, blacks have suffered from racial discrimination in this country, not whites.

To remedy this, we as a society have not only outlawed discrimination, but we have instituted a system of racial preferences for non-whites in college admissions, hiring for jobs, government contracting and job promotion.

This system of preferences is ad hoc in some cases, and government policy in others. But whatever form it takes, it is there, and it is strong evidence of our society's desire to try to make up for past discrimination.

Gays, on the other hand, still are not even protected from outright anti-gay discrimination in many places and situations. And there are few if any places where there are preferences given to gays over straights in school admissions, corporate hiring, etc.

The gay community has aligned itself with the Democratic Party and liberal causes and strongly supported the black community's fight for civil rights, affirmative action and racial preferences over whites.

So a lot of us find it remarkable that a black community so wounded by discrimination would not support us in our fight against discrimination.

It is not racist to take note of this. Calling those of us who do point it out "racist" is merely blaming the victim.

I am fine with helping other people fight their battles against injustice. But I expect them to return the favor.

"We've got ours, now to hell with you" is not acceptable.

Dec 24, 2008 5:01 PM
Get real says:

Every major news source provides statistics about how certain groups vote. Look at CNN during the election: college students, blacks, whites, seniors, men, women... the list goes on. It is totally acceptable and standard news practice.

No one is trying to demonize blacks. If 70 percent of women voted for Prop. 8, that would have been the headline.

Dec 24, 2008 9:30 PM
Matt says:

Sorry Alan J. McCornick, but the fact that 70% of blacks voted for prop 8 is just that, a fact! Numbers don't lie. No other ethnic group supported prop 8 by 70%. No one is going to go back and alter the exit polls because you don't like the result. Stop whining and face reality.

Dec 26, 2008 8:31 AM
charles pratt says:

Mr. McCornick's comments IMHO speak right to the dangers of simplistic racial scapegoating. Much of the past 50 years of pushing ahead progress on Civil Rights has been accomplished by educating, not blaming, the opposition. It was very clear when we No on 8 volunteers challenged Prop 8 signature gathering in an African-American neighborhood last Spring, that we had a lot of organizing work to do in that community. We still do. I must confess that my own immediate reaction to the statistics on the vote was a burst of anger, but then I recalled how much of the movement has entailed organizing, education, discussion. Reciprocity in political support is not automatic, it must be accomplished by hard work. As labor organizer and songwriter Joe Hill reminded us just before he was lynched: don't mourn, organize!

Dec 26, 2008 12:35 PM
Eric says:

Sorry, Matt, but I totally agree with Alan J. McCormick, and I think it's you who needs to face reality. Considering that race and ethnicity are but mere constructs that were designed to keep us divided, it's easy to see that this is not a race/ethnicity issue, but a class issue. On top of that, statements such as "70% of x group voted against y group" are nothing but generalizations - saying this about "black voters" makes it seem like "black voters" across the country would vote the same way. These same exit polls, btw, say that over half of white and hispanic voters voted against 8.

What can be said at best is that people who have had their civil rights violated are now violating those people. Saying group x voted against us just creates another us v. them situation, and I for one am tired of that mentality.

Dec 29, 2008 7:53 PM
andrew says:

Eric:

Who told you that race and ethnicity are mer constructs designed to keep us divided? Your left wing Intro to Sociology professor? Not all of us by into such fashionable academic hype.

"70% of X group voted against Y group" is not a generalization but a specific and verifiable fact.

No one said anything about black voters outside of California.

You might be tired of "us vs. them" mentalities.

You should be even more tired of being discriminated against -- especially by those who have also been discriminated against and should know better.

Dec 29, 2008 11:02 PM

This story is now closed for comments. Commenting is available only on stories in the current week's issue.
Classifieds Place a Classified Ad Business Directory Real Estate
Contact Advertise About GLT