photo
Diego Sucuzhanay, foreground right, brother of Jose Sucuzhanay, is comforted by Francisco Moya, a family spokesperson, outside Elmhurst Hospital Center in the Queens borough of New York following a press conference Sunday, Dec. 14, 2008, regarding the attack and death of his brother Jose. Jose, an Ecuadorian immigrant, died Dec. 12 at the hospital nearly a week after being beaten in the Brooklyn borough of New York by men who yelled anti-Hispanic and anti-gay slurs at him and his brother Romel.   CREDIT: The Associate d Press: Tina Fineberg
national
Latinos’ deaths prompt calls for hate crimes law
Leaders want to expand current legislation
Published Thursday, 25-Dec-2008 in issue 1096
WASHINGTON (AP) – Lawmakers and Hispanic groups on Dec. 16 denounced the beating death of an Ecuadorian immigrant, saying his and other recent slayings of Latino immigrants lend new urgency to the need for a federal hate crimes law.
During a news conference, Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., named three immigrants he said were killed “simply because of who they were.”
Jose Osvaldo Sucuzhanay, an Ecuadorian immigrant living in New York, was beaten Dec. 7 by men who yelled anti-Hispanic and anti-gay slurs at him and his brother, Rommel. Police were still searching for suspects.
“The senseless loss of life cannot be met with silence but rather must be condemned with our loudest voices,” Schumer said.
Latino leaders said considering what appeared to be rising anti-Latino sentiment, Congress should pass legislation to expand the federal hate crimes law. The bill, known as the Matthew Shepard Act, would add protections for bias crimes motivated by gender, sexual orientation and disabilities, and expand Justice Department’s investigative powers.
Current law limits federal investigation of hate crimes to when a federally protected activity is occurring, such as voting. But that restriction would be lifted under the proposal.
The bill also would give local officials resources to investigate hate crimes.
Sucuzhanay’s death followed those of Marcelo Lucero, who was fatally stabbed Nov. 8, in Patchogue, N.Y., by a group of teenagers, and the July 14 death of Luis Ramirez, 25, a Mexican immigrant who was fatally beaten in eastern Pennsylvania.
Prosecutors said seven teenagers charged in Lucero’s assault had set out to find a Hispanic person to attack. Three teenagers have been charged in connection with Ramirez’s death. The three also face charges of ethnic intimidation. A fourth teenager faces less serious charges and will be prosecuted as a juvenile.
FBI statistics show there were 830 Hispanic victims of hate crimes last year, up from 819 the previous year and 595 in 2003.
“We have seen that a culture of fear, hate and xenophobia, ultimately leads to a crime of violence,” said Schumer, who helped sponsor the law that required the government to keep hate crime statistics.
John Trasvina, chairman of the National Hispanic Leadership Agenda, a coalition of Hispanic groups, said the bill, named after a gay college student who was fatally beaten in October 1998 in Laramie, Wyo., would ensure hate crimes are prosecuted when there is reluctance to do so at the local level.
“One of the most important things the hate crimes bill would do would be to bring out the power of the Department of Justice to this effort. Currently most of these crimes are treated as local crimes,” Trasvina said.
Schumer said he would join Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, D-Mass., to push for passage of the bill in the next Congress. President-elect Barack Obama also is likely to support passage of the bill.
E-mail

Send the story “Latinos’ deaths prompt calls for hate crimes law”

Recipient's e-mail: 
Your e-mail: 
Additional note: 
(optional) 
E-mail Story     Print Print Story     Share Bookmark & Share Story
Andrew says:

Hate crime laws outlaw thoughts, opinions and emotions, and are therefore unconstitutional (regardless of what the courts say) violations of the right to free speech.

Under a hate crime law, the guilty person is sentenced for two things -- the actual criminal act, plus his or her hate.

Sorry, if I want to hate something, I should have a perfect right to do that.

Also, the definition of "hate" is a slippery slope that can conflate, say, the perfectly understandable and LEGITIMATE desire of some people in this country to have secure borders and an orderly and lawful system of immigration with irrational hatred of Latinos.

How long will it be before someone is found guilty of "hate" because he or she expressed strong disapproval of illegal immigration and the way our politicians allow illegal immigration to continue unabated?

We in the gay community have fought for the right to have opinions (favoring gays and gay rights) that were for a long time NOT shared by the rest of society, and we have fought for the freedom to be DIFFERENT.

Why, then, should we go against these principles and demand that other people think and live a certain way?

Whatever happened to the sentiment, "I might disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it?"

Are we no longer willing to be a free and democratic society?

I suggest that those who favor hate crime laws read George Orwell's "1984" and learn what thought control leads to.

Dec 24, 2008 5:32 PM

This story is now closed for comments. Commenting is available only on stories in the current week's issue.
Classifieds Place a Classified Ad Business Directory Real Estate
Contact Advertise About GLT